PEOPLES GAZETTE
Justice Binta Nyako of the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court, on Tuesday, recused herself from the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra.
Ms Nyako withdrew from the case following oral applications by Mr Kanu and his lawyer, Aloy Ejimakor, upon resumed hearing in the seven-count terrorism charge filed by the federal government.
At the resumed hearing, the government’s lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo, said the matter was a continuation of trial, and he was ready to proceed. But Mr Ejimakor asked the court to adjourn the trial due to two pending appeals challenging the court’s jurisdiction.
Mr Awomolo argued that a criminal trial could not be stalled because of a pending appeal and that the defence should file for a stay of proceedings at the appellate court.
The judge stated that the parties should not delay the matter, having ruled that the court would not attend to any applications until the end of the trial.
Mr Ejimakor insisted that continuing the trial was inappropriate when he had not adequately prepared his client. He asserted that all court orders directing that his client be allowed to prepare for his defence had allegedly been disobeyed.
Ms Nyako then directed that a prosecution witness be called. While Mr Ejimakor was addressing the court, Mr Kanu stood up from his seat in the dock and ordered him (Mr Ejimakor) to sit down in anger.
“Sit down! I say you should sit down!” Mr Kanu screamed from the dock.
He insisted that the Supreme Court had ruled that the detaining authority should not violate his fundamental rights, especially regarding access to his lawyers.
Turning to Ms Nyako, the IPOB leader said, “My lord, I have no confidence in this court anymore and I ask you to recuse yourself because you did not abide by the decision of the Supreme Court.
“I can understand it if the DSS refuse to obey a court order, but for this court to refuse to obey an order of the Supreme Court is regrettable. I am asking you to recuse yourself from this case.”
But Mr Awomolo countered the argument on the Supreme Court’s judgment delivered in 2023. He argued that the apex court mandated the lower court to proceed with the hearing and determination of Kanu’s trial.
He stated that Mr Kanu’s claims did not align with the Supreme Court’s verdict.
“This is clearly an incompetent and audacious observation,” Mr Awomolo said.
As far as she was concerned, the judge responded that nothing in the Supreme Court’s lead judgment supported Mr Kanu’s assertion.
