What’s the point of PCR Tests anymore?

What’s the point of PCR Tests anymore?

If you had COVID-19 symptoms in 2020, you probably would have masked up and braved a visit to a laboratory, doctor’s office, or clinic to get a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. A health care worker would have shoved a swab up your nose, and then you would have waited a day or two, if not more, to get your results.

Now, you’d likely use an at-home test, which spits out results in just 15 minutes. It’s easier, faster, and reliable, even against the latest variants. Though they’re not perfect, at-home tests will detect infections about 80% of the time, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

So is there any reason to get a PCR test anymore?

Judging by the steep drop-off in PCR testing rates, many people seem to have decided there is not. Roughly a year ago, more than 15 million laboratory test results were reported to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention each week. Now, that number has dropped to about 2 million per week—and it’s not just because there’s less virus circulating. Studies show that use of at-home tests has steadily increased over time, suggesting that many people are opting to test themselves instead of getting PCR tests.

If you’re feeling fine and simply doing your due diligence before traveling, socializing, or going to an appointment, an at-home test is a great option, says Dr. Charles Chiu, a professor of laboratory medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. If you’re experiencing symptoms and want to know whether they’re caused by COVID-19, rapid tests can also do a good job.

But there are still times when a PCR test is best, Chiu says.

PCR tests are considered the gold standard of COVID-19 detection because they’re highly sensitive, able to detect even small amounts of the virus’ genetic material. The SARS-CoV-2 virus takes some time to build up in the body after exposure, with viral load typically peaking around the time symptoms emerge. A PCR test may detect an infection even before that peak, says Dr. Chaz Langelier, an infectious disease physician with the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Most at-home tests, by contrast, are antigen tests that detect viral proteins. They’re good indicators of whether someone is currently contagious, but they’re not always sensitive enough to pick up on small amounts of virus, Langelier says. That’s why most antigen tests are meant to be used repeatedly: if someone tests shortly after an exposure, they might not yet have enough virus in their system for the test to detect it. A day or two later, however, they may test positive.

Antigen tests work well if you can do that sort of serial testing, already have symptoms (and thus probably have quite a bit of virus in your system), or want to know about your current contagiousness, such as before an event.

But PCR tests are still the best option for situations where “you only have a single opportunity to test and if you missed an infection that was impending, the consequences could be disastrous,” Langelier says. For example, it’s wise to test people before they’re admitted to a hospital or nursing home, where they could spread the virus to lots of vulnerable people if an antigen test missed a brewing illness, he says.

Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *