Why Abia, Imo, Ondo states should be removed from NDDC – Edwin Clark

Why Abia, Imo, Ondo states should be removed from NDDC – Edwin Clark

NAIJA NEWS

Prominent Ijaw leader, Chief Edwin Clark has called on President Bola Tinubu to remove Abia, Imo and Ondo states from the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

According to the elder statesman, the three states were initially included for the sake of convenience.

He argued further that the presence of Abia, Imo and Ondo States in the 2000 NDDC Act is a political aberration.

Clark therefore called on President Tinubu to re-enact a new bill for the oil production states of Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers, Edo and Akwa Ibom.

He said: “If NDDC is to succeed, the three states should be severed from the act.

“NDDC should remain the six original Niger Delta Coastal States. All other oil producing states should establish a relationship with the oil companies and Nigeria.

“This is particularly now that oil has been found in other parts of Nigeria including Anambra which is already producing 0.9%, Bauchi, Gombe, Nasarawa, Kogi, and Lagos States.

“They cannot therefore be part of NDDC.

“The NDDC Establishment Act 2000 signed by the then Senate President Chuba Okadigbo outlined the functions of the nine states and who should be the Executive Management.

“One should bear in mind that the addition of Ondo, Imo and Abia was a political aberration.

“For me to demand for the removal of Non-Niger Delta Oil Producing States from NDDC is for NDDC to succeed.

“The success of the NDDC is the success of Nigeria.

“There was a reason why Imo, Abia and Ondo were brought into NDDC. Geographically they are not niger delta; they are not coastal states. It was a political aberration.

“The Federal Government should make arrangements to accommodate them as it is in NDCC same principle to be used not to disorganised the NDDC we want to succeed.”

The elder statesman argued further that it is unreasonable for states that are in the minority and produce little oil to be aspiring to become the Chairman or Managing Director of the NDDC or demand the removal of of the leadership that has already been approved by the Senate.

“A situation where a minority shareholder in a limited liability company would like to be a managing director of the company, it is unreasonable, improper and chaotic.

“That is the main reason why I said no.

“It is not possible for a minority shareholder of even 5 per cent to be the Chairman or Managing Director of the limited liability company.

Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *