Clancy juror admitted doubt but refused insanity verdict, foreperson says
A juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial acknowledged having reasonable doubt but refused to support a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict, according to the jury foreperson cited by Fox News.
The revelation came after the jury failed to reach a unanimous decision, prompting a mistrial in the Massachusetts case. Clancy, who admitted killing her three children in January 2023, had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, with her defense arguing that she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis.
The jury reportedly split 11-1 in favor of an insanity verdict, with one juror holding out despite acknowledging doubts. The judge ultimately declared a mistrial after several days of deliberations.
Prosecutors could seek a retrial.
POPULAR
- ‘Who does he thinks he is?’ Ex-Barcelona president hits out at Lionel Messi
- EFCC prosecutes Nigerian-American over alleged $680,000 car import scam
- After detectives rejected N8m bribe, Police promote officer who signed their dismissal
- NASA may have discovered signs of life on another planet, but scientists face major challenge
- Does Bolaji Abdullahi understand what qualifies Taiwo Oyedele to be Finance Minister?
Rifnote
Loading your desk